Re: [PATCH 3/3] omap: add hwspinlock device

[Ohad Ben-Cohen]

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Hilman
<khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +postcore_initcall(hwspinlocks_init);
>
> Any reason this needs to be a postcore_initcall?  Are there users of
> hwspinlocks this early in boot?

i2c-omap, which is subsys_initcall (the I2C bus is shared between the
A9 and the M3 on some OMAP4 boards).

And to allow early board code to reserve specific hwspinlock numbers
for predefined use-cases, we probably want to be before arch_initcall.

> The I2C   Probaly subsys or even device_initcall
> is more appropriate here.
>
> I would've suspected that any users of hwspinlocks will be dependent on
> drivers for the other cores (e.g. syslink) which would likely be
> initialized much later.
>
> Kevin
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/