Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] memcg: check memcg dirty limits in pagewriteback

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:00:15 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:39:44 -0700
> Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then
> > global_dirty_limits() will consider the memcg dirty limit.
> > This allows different cgroups to have distinct dirty limits
> > which trigger direct and background writeback at different
> > levels.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
Why FREEPAGES in memcg is not counted as dirtyable ?

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/