Re: + softirq-cleanup-preempt-check.patch added to -mm tree

[Jiri Slaby]

On 10/09/2010 06:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But I agree the line should be split, I however much prefer the form:
> 
> static inline
> void softirq_preempt_check(struct softirq_action *h, int prev_count)

Ok I can do that while I'm ratelimiting the message. When this error
occurs, it floods the kmsg quite a lot for works like netif_rx.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/