Re: [UnifiedV4 00/16] The Unified slab allocator (V4)

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, David Rientjes wrote:

> Overall, the results are _much_ better than the vanilla slub allocator
> that I frequently saw ~20% regressions with the TCP_RR netperf benchmark
> on a couple of my machines with larger cpu counts.  However, there still
> is a significant performance degradation compared to slab.

It seems that the memory leak is still present. This likely skews the
results. Thought I had it fixed. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/