RE: Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes
From: Jon Maloy
Date: Wed Oct 20 2010 - 13:57:45 EST
<...>
> subscr struct because 0x0 is a valid filter in TIPC 2.0.
>
>
> Another option is to change the TIPC 2.0 specification to use
> the old format (use HBO in subscriptions and keep
> TIPC_SUB_SERVICE as a separate flag with value 2) and forget
> about all this. After all, I can't see what advantages gives
> having to change the BO for internal messages between the
> applications and the stack.
I agree with this. I have no problems with changing the draft
(which as Leandro already noted is "work-in-progress") to specify that
both HBO and NBO are permitted over the wire, and that it is the
topology server's task to keep track of which one is used.
Remember, permitting both is a superset of the current one (NBO only)
so it is fully backwards compatible. We break absolutly nothing by
permitting this.
>
> [1] http://tipc.sourceforge.net/doc/draft-spec-tipc-06.html
> [2] http://tipc.sourceforge.net/doc/draft-spec-tipc-06.html#anchor92
>
> --
> Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> CARANCHO OBNUBILADO APARECE EN PARQUE CHACABUCO!
> -- Crónica TV
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/