Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 10:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The modified define in kernel.org would only apply if pr_fmt isn't already defined,
> so that argument is not really correct. The real difference would be that you could
> then remove the individual pr_fmt defines from 211 files, and all users of pr_fmt
> without module name (ie those hard to read) would be easier to read/identify.

I think that's not a good idea for now,
though I agree with the general concept.

This is in kernel.h now.

#ifndef pr_fmt
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
#endif

A lot of the pr_<level> calls already include
some internal prefix.

Try:
$ grep -rP --include=*.[ch] -oh "\bpr_\w+\s*\(\s*\"\w+:" * | \
	cut -f2- -d"(" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

You're suggesting modifying 100+ files to get the
same output used now.

I think doing something like this after some more
generally accepted agreement is reached on how best
to do it would be better.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/