Re: [PATCH 17/21] fs: protect wake_up_inode with inode->i_lock

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Oct 20 2010 - 22:17:30 EST

Next message: Dave Chinner: "Re: [PATCH 5/6] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inodeinformation cache"
Previous message: Theodore Ts'o: "What am I doing wrong? submit_bio() suddenly stops working..."
In reply to: Dave Chinner: "[PATCH 17/21] fs: protect wake_up_inode with inode->i_lock"
Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: [PATCH 17/21] fs: protect wake_up_inode with inode->i_lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Looks good, and thanks for documenting unlock_new_inode.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave Chinner: "Re: [PATCH 5/6] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inodeinformation cache"
Previous message: Theodore Ts'o: "What am I doing wrong? submit_bio() suddenly stops working..."
In reply to: Dave Chinner: "[PATCH 17/21] fs: protect wake_up_inode with inode->i_lock"
Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: [PATCH 17/21] fs: protect wake_up_inode with inode->i_lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]