Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prevent unloadable modules from usingtrace_bprintk()
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Oct 21 2010 - 04:17:10 EST
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> While debugging a module, I found that unloading the module and
> then reading the ring buffer can cause strange side effects, including
> a kernel crash.
>
> This is due to the trace_bprintk(). The trace_bprintk() is a faster
> version of trace_printk(). The difference is that trace_bprintk()
> only copies the arguments and a pointer to the format string into
> the ring buffer.
>
> If a module uses this function and is unloaded, the pointer back to
> the format string in the module is still around. If the trace file
> is read, then the pointer is referenced and this can cause a kernel
> oops.
>
> The simple solution is to not let modules use trace_bprintk() and
> instead it will use the slower version of this.
>
> When talking with Frederic Weisbecker about it, he suggested not to
> punish modules that can not be unloaded since they do not have
> this side effect. Modules that can not be unloaded can still use
> trace_bprintk(). We added a check for MODVERSIONS to be set to make
> sure that the module and kernel have the same options. If you
> run without MODVERSIONS set, and you load a module that was compiled
> differently, then that's just your tough luck.
>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/trace/trace_printk.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 2b0a35e..1003476 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -538,6 +538,23 @@ do { \
> ____trace_printk_check_format(fmt, ##args); \
> } while (0)
>
> +/*
> + * Module code must not use trace_bprintk, because if it is unloaded
> + * then we leave a pointer back to the module code inside
> + * the ring buffer, and then reading the ring buffer may cause a bug.
> + *
> + * We do allow for modules to use it if the kernel does not allow
> + * unloading of modules, and MODVERSIONS is set (to make sure kernel
> + * and module are the same). If you load modules without MODVERSIONS
> + * set, then you deserve what you get.
> + */
> +#if defined(MODULE) && \
> + (defined(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) || !defined(CONFIG_MODVERSIONS))
Erm. Ignore checkpatch when the solution is to mess up the code ...
> +# define FORCE_TRACEPRINTK 1
> +#else
> +# define FORCE_TRACEPRINTK 0
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * trace_printk - printf formatting in the ftrace buffer
> * @fmt: the printf format for printing
> @@ -558,14 +575,14 @@ do { \
> #define trace_printk(fmt, args...) \
> do { \
> __trace_printk_check_format(fmt, ##args); \
> - if (__builtin_constant_p(fmt)) { \
> + if (__builtin_constant_p(fmt) && !FORCE_TRACEPRINTK) { \
> static const char *trace_printk_fmt \
> __attribute__((section("__trace_printk_fmt"))) = \
> __builtin_constant_p(fmt) ? fmt : NULL; \
> \
> __trace_bprintk(_THIS_IP_, trace_printk_fmt, ##args); \
> } else \
> - __trace_printk(_THIS_IP_, fmt, ##args); \
> + __trace_printk(_THIS_IP_, fmt, ##args); \
> } while (0)
>
> extern int
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> index 2547d88..c4a5db6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ int __trace_bprintk(unsigned long ip, const char *fmt, ...)
> va_end(ap);
> return ret;
> }
> +#if !FORCE_TRACEPRINTK
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__trace_bprintk);
> +#endif
Looks quite ugly all around. Cannot suggest anything better though straight away -
so please Cc: it more widely and get an ack from the module folks: Rusty, Linus,
akpm.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/