Re: [PATCH] fs: return error on error condition
From: AmÃrico Wang
Date: Thu Oct 21 2010 - 05:12:13 EST
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:50:47PM +0200, Nicolas Kaiser wrote:
>It's intended to return an error, right?
>
>Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@xxxxxxxxx>
>---
> fs/pipe.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
>index 279eef9..37eb1eb 100644
>--- a/fs/pipe.c
>+++ b/fs/pipe.c
>@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *_iov,
> error = ops->confirm(pipe, buf);
> if (error) {
> if (!ret)
>- error = ret;
>+ ret = error;
> break;
> }
>
Wow, I think you are right. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/