Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL] tracing: Fix compile issue fortrace_sched_wakeup.c

[Jason Baron]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:26:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > FYI, there's a new mystery hang (sometimes crash) that triggers in -tip - and which 
> > > seems to be tracing related. See the crashlog below - config attached.
> > > 
> > > It's not bisectable - small changes in the kernel make the bug come/go. (might be a 
> > > race of some sorts)
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > > [   42.324027] Testing all events: 
> > > [  245.668090] INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > > [  245.672051] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > [  245.676026] swapper       D f6420b40  6544     1      0 0x00000000
> > > [  245.684051]  f6437dac 00000046 f694aac0 f6420b40 f6438000 f6437d74 f6438294 f6438290
> > > [  245.692237]  c2192ac0 c204e6c0 c2192ac0 c2192ac0 f6438290 00000000 f6438000 ff2ffa7d
> > > [  245.701068]  00000009 f6420b40 f6437e5c 7fffffff f6438000 f6437dfc f6437e5c 7fffffff
> > > [  245.709071] Call Trace:
> > > [  245.711551]  [<c1a7f561>] schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x1e7
> > > [  245.712036]  [<c1a818b6>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x43
> > > [  245.716037]  [<c1027f2d>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x4/0x98
> > > [  245.720061]  [<c1a818b6>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x43
> > > [  245.724036]  [<c1027fb4>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x8b/0x98
> > > [  245.728036]  [<c1a7e76b>] wait_for_common+0xc1/0x11a
> > > [  245.732062]  [<c102de32>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x12
> > > [  245.736041]  [<c1a7e863>] wait_for_completion+0x17/0x19
> > > [  245.740069]  [<c10667a2>] __stop_cpus+0xdd/0x103
> > > [  245.744072]  [<c1a7e6db>] ? wait_for_common+0x31/0x11a
> > > [  245.748040]  [<c10665a4>] ? stop_machine_cpu_stop+0x0/0x9a
> > > [  245.752040]  [<c106683d>] stop_cpus+0x2c/0x3f
> > > [  245.756069]  [<c10668af>] __stop_machine+0x5f/0x67
> > > [  245.760186]  [<c1006240>] ? stop_machine_text_poke+0x0/0x43
> > > [  245.764040]  [<c1006240>] ? stop_machine_text_poke+0x0/0x43
> > > [  245.768071]  [<c19f0a73>] ? cfdgml_create+0x2b/0xde
> > > [  245.772040]  [<c10060fd>] text_poke_smp+0x3a/0x42
> > > [  245.776039]  [<c19f0a73>] ? cfdgml_create+0x2b/0xde
> > 
> > 
> > > [  245.780098]  [<c1005b9c>] arch_jump_label_transform+0x53/0x67
> > > [  245.784042]  [<c104ef0d>] jump_label_update+0x49/0x98
> > 
> > Looks like this code had jump labels enabled. Do you have a dump where
> > they are not enabled?
> 
> No. Good find - and the timeline agrees too, these crashes started triggering when i 
> pulled jump labels from you.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

indeed. I can re-produce reliably as well on x86...hmmm, I have done stress
testing where I basically just enable/disable all the tracepoints in a
tight loop and never saw this...but I mostly have been testing on
x86_64.

thanks,

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/