Re: [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Thu Oct 21 2010 - 17:34:46 EST
On 10/21/2010 02:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 02:06 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Ping? Have you had any thoughts about possible x86-64 problems with this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> J
> I didn't find any, so I already committed your patch to tip:x86/mm two
> days ago.
Oh, thanks! I didn't see the tip commit.
> Now, it's worth noting that Linus has asked us to get rid of
> vmalloc_sync_all() completely, which would be a good thing in the longer
> term.
Fine by me.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/