Re: On Linux numbering scheme

[Artem S. Tashkinov]

----- "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Artem S. Tashkinov
> <t.artem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > What can you say about kernel 2.6.32? Almost nothing.
> >
> > What can you say about kernel 3.11.3? - it is the third release of
> > Linux in 2011.
> 
> And? What a useless information.
> 
> BTW, it should be 3.2011.3, see Y2K.

Do you really believe Linux kernel will make it through 2100?

I bet by that time we will have some totally different hardware and
software. Besides none of use will be alive by that time, so I don't
see a problem. Besides, upon reaching 2100, if Linux still exists in
its current form, the first digit could be increased to 4. :)

Best wishes,

Artem

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/