Re: [PATCH 16/21] fs: Protect inode->i_state with the inode->i_lock

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> One more note: IMO sb list lock is better off inside the hash one; when we
> do per-chain hash locks, we'll be better off if we don't have to hold sb
> one over the entire chain search.

Why would you nest these two at all?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/