Re: [PATCH] sdio: fix suspend/resume regression

[Ohad Ben-Cohen]

Hi Maxim,

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 09:31 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> Fix SDIO suspend/resume regression introduced by
>> 4c2ef25fe0b847d2ae818f74758ddb0be1c27d8e "mmc: fix all hangs related to
>> mmc/sd card insert/removal during suspend/resume":
...
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index c94565d..515ff39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -1682,6 +1682,19 @@ int mmc_suspend_host(struct mmc_host *host)
>>       if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead) {
>>               if (host->bus_ops->suspend)
>>                       err = host->bus_ops->suspend(host);
>> +             if (err == -ENOSYS || !host->bus_ops->resume) {
> This reintroduces the bug I fixed.
>
> if the CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME isn't set (and that is default
> unfortunately), the host->bus_ops->resume will be NULL (see core/mmc.c
> mmc_ops), and therefore card will be removed, that will trigger a block
> device removal, sync, and deadlock).

Have you reproduced this or is it just a general concern ?

I'm asking this because if CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME isn't set, then
mmc_pm_notify() will remove the card and detach the bus.

As a result, host->bus_ops will be unset, and host->bus_dead will be set.

In this case, mmc_suspend_host() should skip the code you are concerned about.

Regards,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/