Re: [PATCH 28/49] tty: Add a new file /proc/tty/consoles

From: Al Viro
Date: Sat Oct 23 2010 - 07:51:34 EST


On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:40:24PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 08:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Used for open /proc/tty/consoles. Before this detect
> > + * the device ID of file descriptor 0 of the current
> > + * reading task if a character device...
> > + */
> > +static int tty_consoles_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct files_struct *curfiles;
> > +
> > + current_dev = 0;
> > + curfiles = get_files_struct(current);
> > + if (curfiles) {
> > + const struct file *curfp;
> > + spin_lock(&curfiles->file_lock);
> > + curfp = fcheck_files(curfiles, 0);
> > + if (curfp && curfp->private_data) {
> > + const struct inode *inode;
> > + dget(curfp->f_dentry);
> > + inode = curfp->f_dentry->d_inode;
> > + if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode)) {
> > + struct tty_struct *tty;
> > + tty = (struct tty_struct *)curfp->private_data;
> > + if (tty && tty->magic == TTY_MAGIC) {
>
> Ah, I've just understood what this code does. It seems, that the 'tty'
> at this point may be already freed (e.g. people don't set private_data
> to NULL). Please explain in the code why it can't...

Please, don't. Even leaving aside the fact that it's mind-bogglingly
broken (->private_data can be _ANYTHING_, including arbitrary number cast
to pointer), you really shouldn't screw your way through the descriptor
table in the first place.

Strongly NACKed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/