Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:40:50PM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:04 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> > It would be some change in virtio-net driver that may have improved
> > the
> > latency of small messages which in turn would have reduced the
> > bandwidth
> > as TCP could not accumulate and send large packets.
> 
> I will check out any latency improvement patch in virtio_net. If that's
> the case, whether it is good to have some tunable parameter to benefit
> both BW and latency workload?
> 
> Shirley 

No, we need it to work well automatically somehow.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/