Re: [PATCH] UWB: Return UWB_RSV_ALLOC_NOT_FOUND rather thancrashing on NULL dereference if kzalloc fails
From: Greg KH
Date: Mon Nov 08 2010 - 11:42:43 EST
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:43:02PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Crashing on a null pointer deref is never a nice thing to do. It seems to
> > me that it's better to simply return UWB_RSV_ALLOC_NOT_FOUND if kzalloc()
> > fails in uwb_rsv_find_best_allocation().
>
> This is fine.
>
> struct uwb_rsv_alloc_info is not that large (about 414 bytes I think) so
> it could possibly go on the stack and avoid the allocation.
>
> Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxx>
>
> Greg, seeing as I'm not maintaining the UWB subsystem any more do you
> want to pick this (and future) UWB patches?
Yes, I can do that, and will take this one.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/