Re: [PATCH v2 12/23] netpoll: Introduce netpoll_target configs

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:34:24AM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:27 PM, AmÃrico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:30:24AM +0800, AmÃrico Wang wrote:
>>>
>> ....
>>>
>>>So, either we need to de-modulize configfs or replace configfs API
>>>with sysfs API. Personally, I prefer the former one, I don't think
>>>configfs should be a module as long as it can provide API's
>>>for other subsystems, like debugfs.
>>>
>>
>> To clarify, I meant "as long as the API it provides can be used by
>> other core subsystems".
>>
>
>Ya, I see the problem with it being a tristate.
>
>Why not just make netconsole support being compiled in force configfs
>to be compiled in?  Or does that just set bad precedent?

That is what netconsole does now, and this is fine, since netconsole is
a module too, however, after you move that code into netpoll, then netpoll
will have a dependence on it, we will have problems.

I think we can let NETPOLL_TARGET depend on CONFIGFS_FS=y, but I still
see no reason why CONFIGFS_FS should be a module.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/