Re: [PATCH] mxcmmc: Add the ability to bind a regulator to managethe MMC card voltage
From: Alberto Panizzo
Date: Tue Nov 09 2010 - 05:03:21 EST
On lun, 2010-11-08 at 23:12 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2010/11/2 Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > +static inline void mxcmci_init_ocr(struct mxcmci_host *host)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > + host->vcc = regulator_get(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "vmmc");
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR(host->vcc)) {
> > + host->vcc = NULL;
> > + } else {
> > + host->mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask(host->vcc);
> > + if (host->pdata && host->pdata->ocr_avail)
> > + dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> > + "pdata->ocr_avail will not be used\n");
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> You don't need these #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR guardposts
> anymore. I implemented stub functions for the ocrmask functions
> for 2.6.37.
Ehm.. thank you really for pointing me this, because I've also used the
old API breaking the build in the -next branch..
A Fix will be posted as soon as possible!
Thanks Linus!
Best regards,
--
Alberto!
Be Persistent!
- Greg Kroah-Hartman (FOSDEM 2010)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/