Re: [bisected] Clocksource tsc unstable git

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:58 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Does that make any sense or did I miss something obvious?

I'd write it as a PREEMPT_ACTIVE check, but yes I think you're right.

That said, I also have the below patch queued which should fix up the
wakeup-preemption.


---
Subject: sched: Fixup cross sched_class wakeup preemption
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun Oct 31 12:37:04 CET 2010

Instead of dealing with sched classes inside each check_preempt_curr()
implementation, pull out this logic into the generic wakeup preemption
path.

This fixes a hang in KVM (and others) where we are waiting for the
stop machine thread to run..

Tested-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <1288891946.2039.31.camel@laptop>
---
 kernel/sched.c          |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 kernel/sched_fair.c     |    6 ------
 kernel/sched_stoptask.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -560,18 +560,8 @@ struct rq {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
 
-static inline
-void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
-{
-	rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
 
-	/*
-	 * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule.  In
-	 * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update.
-	 */
-	if (test_tsk_need_resched(p))
-		rq->skip_clock_update = 1;
-}
+static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
 
 static inline int cpu_of(struct rq *rq)
 {
@@ -9402,4 +9392,30 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
 
+static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
+{
+	const struct sched_class *class;
+
+	if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class) {
+		rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
+	} else {
+		for_each_class(class) {
+			if (class == rq->curr->sched_class)
+				break;
+			if (class == p->sched_class) {
+				resched_task(rq->curr);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule.  In
+	 * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update.
+	 */
+	if (test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
+		rq->skip_clock_update = 1;
+}
+
+
 #endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1654,12 +1654,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct 
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
 	int scale = cfs_rq->nr_running >= sched_nr_latency;
 
-	if (unlikely(rt_prio(p->prio)))
-		goto preempt;
-
-	if (unlikely(p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class))
-		return;
-
 	if (unlikely(se == pse))
 		return;
 
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select_task_rq_stop(struct rq *rq, struc
 static void
 check_preempt_curr_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 {
-	resched_task(rq->curr); /* we preempt everything */
+	/* we're never preempted */
 }
 
 static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/