Re: [PATCH 1/1][2nd resend] sys_unshare: remove the deadCLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM code

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 11/09, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > -static void check_unshare_flags(unsigned long *flags_ptr)
> > +static int check_unshare_flags(unsigned long unshare_flags)
> >  {
> > +	if (unshare_flags & ~(CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_FS|CLONE_NEWNS|CLONE_SIGHAND|
> > +				CLONE_VM|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SYSVSEM|
> > +				CLONE_NEWUTS|CLONE_NEWIPC|CLONE_NEWNET))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
>
> Please put WARN_ON_ONCE() explicitly. That's good way to find hidden
> user if exist and getting better bug report.

Perhaps... but this needs a separate change.

Please note that this check was simply moved from sys_unshare(), this
patch shouldn't have any visible effect.

Personally, I think it would be even better if, say, unshare(CLONE_THREAD)
returned -EINVAL unconditionally.

> And, I've reveied this patch and I've found no fault. but I will not put
> my ack because I think I haven't understand original intention perhaps.

Thanks!

IIRC, the main (only?) motivation for sys_unshare() was unshare_fs().
Most probably unshare_thread/vm were added as placeholders.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/