Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: sysfs type id

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Nov 09 2010 - 17:22:28 EST


On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 23:11 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 22:45, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The below is a RFC patch adding dynamic type ids to perf.
> >
> > We need to represent PMUs in sysfs because we want to allow multiple
> > (loadable) PMUs and need a way to identify them.
> >
> > This patch creates a new device class "pmu" and adds a single attribute
> > "type" to it. This device attribute will expose the dynamic type id as
> > required by perf_event_attr::type.
> >
> > The sysfs layout looks like:
> >
> > [root@westmere ~]# cd /sys/class/pmu/
>
> Please use a 'bus_type' instead of 'class'.
>
> I'm very sure, some day, you'll need global attributes for the pmu
> stuff, and class -- unlike bus -- has its own subdir where you can go
> wild, without mixing things with the list-of-devices. :)

Having its own subdir sounds like a pro, so I'm somewhat confused. Also
the pmu (or event_source as Ingo would like it getting called) seems
like a class of devices not a bus.

USB/PCI/I2C/ISA are all buses.. pmu/event_source not so much, they are
very different (sometimes even pure software) things that provide a
common interface -- they generate events which we can count and sample.

/me dazed & confused, please do explain.

> No new stuff should use 'class', it's not extensible.

Hrm.. when I introduced the bdi stuff class was _the_ thing to use.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/