Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] perf stat: Use event group to simulate PMI onPMI-less hardware counter

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Nov 10 2010 - 07:21:57 EST


On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 14:15 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> Some hardware counters(for example, Intel RAPL) can't generate interrupt
> when overflow. So we need to simulate the interrupt to periodically
> record the counter values. Otherwise, the counter may overflow and the
> wrong value is read.
>
> This patch uses event group to simulate PMI as suggested by Peter
> Zijlstra, http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128220854801819&w=2
>
> create_group_counters() will create a group with 2 events, one hrtimer
> based event as the group leader, and the other event to count. The
> hrtimer is fired periodically, so the sibling event can record its
> counter value periodically as well.

I'm terribly confused here....

- you introduce perf_event_attr:pmi_simulate, but then you never
implement it -- nor do we need it afaict.


- you use grouped counters for perf-stat, perf-stat doesn't use
sampling so I don't see a need to group events to simulate the PMI.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/