Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/22] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE policy implementation

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:30 +0200, Raistlin wrote:
> +static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> +{
> +       struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
> +       struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The arrival of a new instance needs special treatment, i.e.,
> +        * the actual scheduling parameters have to be "renewed".
> +        */
> +       if (dl_se->dl_new) {
> +               setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq->clock) ||
> +           dl_entity_overflow(dl_se, rq->clock)) {
> +               dl_se->deadline = rq->clock + dl_se->dl_deadline;
> +               dl_se->runtime = dl_se->dl_runtime;
> +       }
> +} 

Can't we loose runtime deficit this way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/