RE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc

[Bounine, Alexandre]

Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [Xie Shaohui-B21989] Hi Alex, seems your suggestion is some kind of
> > conflict with Kumar, you can have a look at
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/67774/
> 
> I think Alex's comment is the fact we ignore the 'return' value in the
machine_check_e500 case.

Yes, this one and plus the fact that Mchk exception messages are printed
even if it was handled successfully (by RIO handler). Messages are
printed in both: e500 and e500mc handlers.

Alex.
  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/