Re: [PATCH][RESEND] nommu: yield CPU periodically while disposinglarge VM

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:33:16 -0600 "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Depending on processor speed, page size, and the amount of memory a process
> is allowed to amass, cleanup of a large VM may freeze the system for many
> seconds. This can result in a watchdog timeout.

hm, that's no good.

> Make sure other tasks receive some service when cleaning up large VMs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Magnani <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff -uprN a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> --- a/mm/nommu.c	2010-10-21 07:42:23.000000000 -0500
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c	2010-10-21 07:46:50.000000000 -0500
> @@ -1656,6 +1656,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munmap, unsigned long, a
>  void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	unsigned long next_yield = jiffies + HZ;
>  
>  	if (!mm)
>  		return;
> @@ -1668,6 +1669,11 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  		mm->mmap = vma->vm_next;
>  		delete_vma_from_mm(vma);
>  		delete_vma(mm, vma);
> +		/* Yield periodically to prevent watchdog timeout */
> +		if (time_after(jiffies, next_yield)) {
> +			cond_resched();
> +			next_yield = jiffies + HZ;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	kleave("");

You might be able to do this a bit more neatly with __ratelimit:

	DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rl, HZ, 1);

	...

	if (___ratelimit(&rl, NULL))
		cond_resched();

but ___ratelimit() isn't really ready for that - it still has (easily
fixed) assumptions that it's being used for printk ratelimiting.


But anyway.  cond_resched() is pretty efficient and one second is still
a very long time.  I suspect you don't need the ratelimiting at all?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/