Re: [PATCH] RFC: nomadik: expand timesource to 63 bits

[Linus Walleij]

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>
>>> Instead of implementing sched_clock for each architecture seperatly,
>>> wouldn't it be nice to have a generic sched_clock that uses the
>>> architecture's clocksource?  I tried to implement that some time ago,
>>> but tglx shoot it down because of locking problems.
>> I was and still am a big fan of this approach, I am willing to help
>> testing it if you want to dust off this patch set...
> 
> sched_clock is not necessarily the same as the current clocksource.

IIRC Uwe:s approach was that if and only if you would want to use
the clocksource for sched_clock() you provide a special flag on
the clocksource, and it will be attempted to be used for sched_clock().

Incidentally the dual use of a single free-running timer as both
single clocksource and sched_clock() baseline seem to creep up in
a lot of embedded platforms...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/