Re: [PATCH 06/20] x86/ticketlock: make __ticket_spin_trylock common
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Sat Nov 13 2010 - 05:48:55 EST
Le samedi 13 novembre 2010 Ã 18:17 +0800, AmÃrico Wang a Ãcrit :
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:59:47AM -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> >+ union {
> >+ struct __raw_tickets tickets;
> >+ __ticketpair_t slock;
> >+ } tmp, new;
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ tmp.tickets = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> >+ if (tmp.tickets.head != tmp.tickets.tail)
> >+ return 0;
> >+
> >+ new.slock = tmp.slock + (1 << TICKET_SHIFT);
> >+
> >+ ret = cmpxchg(&lock->ticketpair, tmp.slock, new.slock) == tmp.slock;
> >+ barrier(); /* just make nothing creeps before lock is claimed */
>
> This one should be smp_wmb(), right? No CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE protected.
cmpxchg() is a full memory barrier, no need for smp_wmb() or barrier()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/