Re: [Cocci] Re: status of constification

[Emese Revfy]

>>> What would the right approach be?  It is not obvious to find 100% of the 
>>> header files, because some of them depend on information in Makefiles.  
>>
>> For 100% coverage you can look at how the Linux Makefiles invoke sparse.
> 
> I haven't looked at it, but I doubt it gives 100% coverage, because one 
> can have code in both the if and else branches of an ifdef.  I would 
> imagine that it gives 100% coverage for whatever architecture you would be 
> compiling for?

For my purposes it's enough to find all includes for a given .config.

What would be also useful is if Coccinelle could somehow ignore ifdef's that
guard code blocks so that it would analyse all code in a translation unit. 

Thanks Emese

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/