Re: [PATCH] oom: create a resource limit for oom_adj

From: David Rientjes
Date: Sun Nov 14 2010 - 16:42:44 EST

Next message: Jesper Juhl: "[PATCH] Reduce number of pointer dereferences in IPv4 netfilter LOGmodule function dump_packet()"
Previous message: Brian K. White: "Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)"
In reply to: KOSAKI Motohiro: "Re: [PATCH] oom: create a resource limit for oom_adj"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> I've sent revert patch to linus. We DON'T want to break any userland seriously.
> So, we reconsider about this area. personally I hope to reintroduce oom_score_adj
> later, but It must don't break current userland.
>

Nobody is going to stall their development waiting for your patches to be
merged (especially when you've proposed them four times before and they
haven't been), so patches in this area should be against Linus' latest
tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesper Juhl: "[PATCH] Reduce number of pointer dereferences in IPv4 netfilter LOGmodule function dump_packet()"
Previous message: Brian K. White: "Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)"
In reply to: KOSAKI Motohiro: "Re: [PATCH] oom: create a resource limit for oom_adj"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]