Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation

[Bart Van Assche]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison
> of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for
> both of them.

The reason why we are proposing SCST for upstream inclusion are:
- It has a large user base.
- The project is known for its high performance, low latency I/O and
excellent stability.
- A feature-wise overview can be found here:
http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/