Re: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_fill_super shouldn't return 0 on corruption
From: Eric Sandeen
Date: Mon Nov 15 2010 - 16:55:27 EST
On 11/15/10 3:48 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> At the start of ext4_fill_super, ret is set to -EINVAL, and any failure path
> out of that function returns this ret. However, the generic_check_addressable
> clause sets ret = 0 if it passes, which means that a subsequent failure (e.g.
> a group checksum error) returns 0 even though the mount should fail. This
> causes vfs_kern_mount in turn to think that the mount succeeded (because
> PTR_ERR(0) is false), leading to an oops.
>
> A simple fix is to avoid using ret for the generic_check_addressable check,
> which was last changed in commit 30ca22c70e3ef0a96ff84de69cd7e8561b416cb2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
looks right, but one comment below:
> ---
>
> fs/ext4/super.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 40131b7..a44bc59 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -3257,9 +3257,8 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> * Test whether we have more sectors than will fit in sector_t,
> * and whether the max offset is addressable by the page cache.
> */
> - ret = generic_check_addressable(sb->s_blocksize_bits,
> - ext4_blocks_count(es));
> - if (ret) {
> + if (generic_check_addressable(sb->s_blocksize_bits,
> + ext4_blocks_count(es))) {
> ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "filesystem"
> " too large to mount safely on this system");
> if (sizeof(sector_t) < 8)
you probably want to set a "ret = -EFBIG" in here.
-Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/