Re: [PATCH 1/4] udf: Add missed protection for s_lvid_dirty

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Saturday 06 November 2010 18:47:08 Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> As reported in udf_sb.h the udf_sb_infoi's structure member s_lvid_dirty should
> be protected by s_alloc_mutex. Added that mutex on a couple of places where it
> miss.
> 
> This work was supported by a hardware donation from the CE Linux Forum.

Any update on this?

I'd really like to see the BKL disabled by default in 2.6.37, and UDF
is the final blocker for this now.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/