Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up
From: Nick Bowler
Date: Mon Nov 22 2010 - 10:18:00 EST
On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
> for BKL itself.
>
> I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
> more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.
UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/