Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 09:55 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:

> So IIUC, if a task is in root cgroup, then it would not necessarily be driven
> by cpu.shares of root cgroup (as task could be in its own autogroup). But
> if I move the task into a non-root cgroup, then it will for sure be
> subjected to rules imposed by non-root cgroup cpu.shares. That's not too
> bad.

I think the normal case would be either one or the other being in use at
any given time, but yes, if both are active, that's how it'd work.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/