Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective

From: Heinz Diehl
Date: Wed Dec 01 2010 - 14:59:50 EST

Next message: Sage Weil: "Re: [PATCH] rbd: replace the rbd sysfs interface"
Previous message: Vivek Goyal: "Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip"
In reply to: Heinz Diehl: "Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-cryptbarrier support is effective)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 01.12.2010, Milan Broz wrote:

> Anyway, I run several tests on 2.6.37-rc3+ and see no integrity
> problems (using xfs,ext3 and ext4 over dmcrypt).

Not that this might help, but just for testing purposes, I have run all
the -rcX from 2.6.36 on with Milan's patch (XFS filesystem) under heavy
load and disk i/o, and have not encountered a single problem or corruption.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sage Weil: "Re: [PATCH] rbd: replace the rbd sysfs interface"
Previous message: Vivek Goyal: "Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip"
In reply to: Heinz Diehl: "Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-cryptbarrier support is effective)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]