Re: low overhead packet capturing on linux

[Thomas Fjellstrom]

On December 1, 2010, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 05:28:05PM -0700, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > I'm working on a little tool to monitor and measure bandwidth use on a vm
> > host, down to keeping track of all guest and host bandwidth, including,
> > eventually per layer7 protocol use.
> > 
> > Right now I have a pretty simple setup, I setup an AF_PACKET socket,
> > select on it, and read data as it comes in. Obviously, this has a fatal
> > flaw. It takes up a rather large amount of cpu time just to capture the
> > packets. On a GbE interface, it uses up easily 60-80% cpu (on a 2.6Ghz
> > amd phenom II cpu core) just to capture the packets, trying to do
> > anything fancy with them will likely cause the kernel to drop some
> > packets.
> > 
> > So what I'm looking for is a very low overhead way to capture packets.
> > I've come up with a few ideas, some of which I have no idea if they'd
> > even work.
> 
> Have you checked out
> 
> http://public.lanl.gov/cpw/ (IIRC it's actually a part of recent libpcap,
> but could be wrong) and http://www.ntop.org/PF_RING.html ?

Hi,

Thanks, yes, at least I've seen the cpw page, probably briefly looked at the 
PF_RING stuff before. But I'll take a closer look this time, thanks :)

When I was looking before, I was unduly rejecting things that required 
patching the kernel, or adding special drivers. But if it really can help I 
might as well take a look.

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/