Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Dec 01 2010 - 15:34:15 EST
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:10:50 -0500
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ struct address_space_operations {
> sector_t (*bmap)(struct address_space *, sector_t);
> void (*invalidatepage) (struct page *, unsigned long);
> int (*releasepage) (struct page *, gfp_t);
> + void (*freepage)(struct page *);
> ssize_t (*direct_IO)(int, struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
> loff_t offset, unsigned long nr_segs);
> int (*get_xip_mem)(struct address_space *, pgoff_t, int,
It would be good to think about and then clearly spell out exactly what
state the page is in here. It is locked, and I assume clean and not
under writeback. What about its refcount, freezedness status and
eligibility for lookups?
And as Hugh pointed out, some callees might needs the address_space*
although we can perhaps defer that until such a callee turns up.
If/when that happens we might have a problem though: if this locked
page is no longer attached to the address_space then what now pins the
address_space, protecting it from inode reclaim?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/