Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:31:11 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > OK, the stop_machine() plugs a lot of potential race-vs-module-unload
> > things. __But Trond is referring to races against vmscan inode reclaim,
> > unmount, etc.
> 
> So?
> 
> A filesystem module cannot be unloaded while it's still mounted.
> 
> And unmount doesn't succeed until all inodes are gone.
> 
> And getting rid of an inode doesn't succeed until all pages associated
> with it are gone.
> 
> And getting rid of the pages involves locking them (whether in
> truncate or vmscan) and removing them from all lists.
> 
> Ergo: vmscan has a locked page leads to the filesystem being
> guaranteed to not be unmounted.  And that, in turn, guarantees that
> the module won't be unloaded until the machine has gone through an
> idle cycle.

The page isn't attached to the address_space any more:

static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
{
	...
		__remove_from_page_cache(page);
		spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
	...
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/