Re: [BUG(?)] perf_events: combining multiple tracepoint events intoa group produces no counts on member events

From: Corey Ashford
Date: Thu Dec 02 2010 - 03:58:51 EST


On 11/30/2010 05:00 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:

Hi,

I'm not sure that what I'm seeing is a bug, or was something intentional.

If I place multiple tracepoint events into a group and measure counts of
these events on a process, I get no counts for the tracepoint events
other than the group leader.

Is this expected behavior?

It's not clear to me why this should be the case; grouping shouldn't
have any ill effects on tracepoint events, from my understanding.

I noticed this because my private version of the perf tool has the event
group patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/24/584 as well as the patch
which fixes the parsing of multiple tracepoint events in the same -e
switch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/30/460

When I dig into the code a bit, I find that each event opens
successfully, so that's not the problem. If I disable the grouping, then
I get counts for all of the tracepoint events.

False alarm. I found a bug in my forwarded-ported version of the event grouping patch for perf stat. I was setting the attr->disabled bit for all of the events instead of just the group leader, when forking off the command.

Software events, tracepoints, and hardware events all work when grouped now. Sorry, I should have been more thorough in testing this on other types of events. I had thought I had it working with hardware events, and it was, but only if I attached to an existing process, not when forking off a new command. Anyway, if I had tested with hardware events in the same way I had tested tracepoints I would have seen the problem.

So the patch mentioned above, https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/24/584, has a bug, but since it didn't get committed, I suppose it's not a problem. If anyone is still interested, I can post a v4 of that patch.

Sorry for the bother!

- Corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/