Re: [PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Fix memory corruption related to swap

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Dec 02 2010 - 20:03:41 EST


On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:37:21 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:40:36 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch is a fix for a regression and nasty memory corruption, so I'd like
> > > to push it to Linus for 2.6.37 if there are no objections.
>
> (It will need backport to 2.6.35-stable and 2.6.36-stable:
> IIRC it doesn't quite apply cleanly to those, so we'll need
> to send a separate version.)
>
> >
> > It looks OK to me for 2.6.37 but for 2.6.38 please let's make
> > everything here a 100% no-op for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n builds.
> > Specifically the slight overhead in __alloc_pages_nodemask.
>
> I expect you're right that the CONFIG_PM would better be CONFIG__PM_SLEEP;
> but I think you misunderstand gfp_allowed_mask in __alloc_pages_nodemask:
> it came from slab & slub, to fix some early bootup issues, and predates
> Rafael's recent use of it in suspend and hibernation.
>
> >
> > Because given the global nature of saved_gfp_mask and the unlocked way
> > in which it is accessed, this facility won't be at all useful for
> > anything other than suspend.
>
> ... and bootup.
>

Oh. Who writes this crap :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/