Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups

[James Courtier-Dutton]

On 3 December 2010 05:11, Paul Turner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I actually don't have a desktop setup handy to test "interactivity" (sad but
> true -- working on grabbing one). ÂBut it looks better on under synthetic
> load.
>

What tools are actually used to test "interactivity" ?
I posted a tool to the list some time ago, but I don't think anyone noticed.
My tool is very simple.
When you hold a key down, it should repeat. It should repeat at a
constant predictable interval.
So, my tool just waits for key presses and times when each one occurred.
The tester simply presses a key and holds it down.
If the time between each key press is constant, it indicates good
"interactivity". If the time between each key press varies a lot, it
indicates bad "interactivity".
You can reliably test if one kernel is better than the next using
actual measurable figures.

Kind Regards

James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/