Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3 (cifs)

[Jeff Layton]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:09:56 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:04:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20101202:
> > 
> > 
> > When CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not enabled:
> > 
> > (.text+0xdf6c9): undefined reference to `get_cifs_acl'
> > 
> > from fs/cifs/xattr.c:cifs_getxattr()
> > 
> > 
> > CONFIG_CIFS=y
> > # CONFIG_CIFS_STATS is not set
> > CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH=y
> > # CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL is not set
> > CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR=y
> > CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX=y
> > # CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set
> > # CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is not set
> > CONFIG_CIFS_FSCACHE=y
> > CONFIG_CIFS_ACL=y
> > # CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set
> 
> And this build regression has been pushed upstream now, as of:
> 
>    8520eeaa1235: Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6
> 
> and it is triggering for me too:
> 
>    fs/built-in.o: In function `cifs_getxattr':
>    (.text+0xc518e): undefined reference to `get_cifs_acl'
> 
> The regression got introduced by:
> 
>    fbeba8bb16d7: cifs: Handle extended attribute name cifs_acl to generate cifs acl blob (try #4)
> 
> Which introduced the new CIFS_ACL option.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

Yeah, looks like this new Kconfig option depends on some code that's
under the (much-overloaded) CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL Kconfig option. I think
this patch needs some rework. The simple fix would be to make it
dependent on CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL, but that's rather icky since
CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL pulls in some rather broken stuff...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/