Re: [PATCH] Introduce mips_late_time_init

[David Daney]

On 12/06/2010 12:23 AM, Anoop P A wrote:
> This patch moves plat_time_init and clocksoure init funtion calls to
> late_time_init.

Why would you want to do this?

The current code works perfectly, so I see no reason to change it.

David Daney


> Signed-off-by: Anoop P A<anoop.pa@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
> index fb74974..dbd1ac5 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
> @@ -117,10 +117,16 @@ static __init int cpu_has_mfc0_count_bug(void)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> -void __init time_init(void)
> +void __init mips_late_time_init(void)
>   {
>   	plat_time_init();
>
>   	if (!mips_clockevent_init() || !cpu_has_mfc0_count_bug())
>   		init_mips_clocksource();
>   }
> +
> +
> +void __init time_init(void)
> +{
> +	late_time_init = mips_late_time_init;
> +}
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/