Re: [patch 1/4] vt-d: quirk for masking vtd spec errors to platformerror handling logic

From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Mon Dec 06 2010 - 15:45:20 EST


On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:26:30 -0800
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 09:27 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Can we make these registers and bits a bit more self-documenting (i.e.
> > #defines for both, maybe along with other useful bit definitions for
> > this reg)? Also, "error" is misspelled as "erorr" above. :)
>
> Thanks for the review. Appended the updated patch. I haven't used
> #defines for the pci-id's, as the first one (IOH) is used by several
> chipsets and the second one is not named yet.

Is there a bug # that should be referenced in the commit log? Any
tested-bys to add?

Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/