[PATCH] [84/223] net: NETIF_F_HW_CSUM does not imply FCoE CRC offload

[Andi Kleen]

2.6.35-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 66c68bcc489fadd4f5e8839e966e3a366e50d1d5 upstream.

NETIF_F_HW_CSUM indicates the ability to update an TCP/IP-style 16-bit
checksum with the checksum of an arbitrary part of the packet data,
whereas the FCoE CRC is something entirely different.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 net/core/dev.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux/net/core/dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/net/core/dev.c
+++ linux/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1653,10 +1653,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_device_attach);
 
 static bool can_checksum_protocol(unsigned long features, __be16 protocol)
 {
-	return ((features & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM) ||
-		((features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM) &&
+	return ((features & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM) ||
+		((features & NETIF_F_V4_CSUM) &&
 		 protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) ||
-		((features & NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM) &&
+		((features & NETIF_F_V6_CSUM) &&
 		 protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) ||
 		((features & NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC) &&
 		 protocol == htons(ETH_P_FCOE)));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/