Re: [PATCH 09/30] sound: don't use flush_scheduled_work()

[Liam Girdwood]

On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 19:00 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > > For future reference please note that sound/soc is maintained as a
> > > subtree of ALSA - if you could send patches to that separately to myself
> > > and Liam as well as Takashi and Jaroslav that'd make life a little
> > > easier.
> 
> > I can resplit and resend if necessary.  Takashi, do you wanna take the
> > patch as-is or resplit?  Or shall I route it through wq tree?
> 
> No need, just merge it along with the rest of the patch however that's
> going.  I was mentioning this for future reference rather than for the
> present patch.
> 
> Liam, will the TWL6040 updates Magi posted the other day also be
> affected?  I seem to remember they added the same pattern as WM835x has.

Not sure myself.

Magi, could you check your patch queue for any use of
flush_scheduled_work() here ?

Thanks

Liam
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/