Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-cryptbarrier support is effective)

[Dave Chinner]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:20:24AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Jon Nelson's message of 2010-12-07 22:29:26 -0500:
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Jon Nelson's message of 2010-12-07 15:48:58 -0500:
> > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> > Excerpts from Jon Nelson's message of 2010-12-07 15:25:47 -0500:
> > >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> > Excerpts from Jon Nelson's message of 2010-12-07 14:34:40 -0500:
> > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> postgresql errors. Typically, header corruption but from the limited
> > >> >> >> >> visibility I've had into this via strace, what I see is zeroed pages
> > >> >> >> >> where there shouldn't be.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > This sounds a lot like a bug higher up than dm-crypt.  Zeros tend to
> > >> >> >> > come from some piece of code explicitly filling a page with zeros, and
> > >> >> >> > that often happens in the corner cases for O_DIRECT and a few other
> > >> >> >> > places in the filesystem.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Have you tried triggering this with a regular block device?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> I just tried the whole set of tests, but with /dev/sdb directly (as
> > >> >> >> ext4) without any crypt-y bits.
> > >> >> >> It takes more iterations but out of 6 tests I had one failure: same
> > >> >> >> type of thing, 'invalid page header in block ....'.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> I can't guarantee that it is a full-page of zeroes, just what I saw
> > >> >> >> from the (limited) stracing I did.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Fantastic. Now for our usual suspects:
> > 
> > Maybe not so fantastic. I kept testing and had no more failures. At
> > all. After 40+ iterations I gave up.
> > I went back to trying ext4 on a LUKS volume. The 'hit' ratio went to
> > something like 1 in 3, or better.
> > 
> > I will continue to do testing with and without LUKS. I did /not/
> > reboot between tests, but I do start with a fresh postgres database.
> > 
> 
> Once we trigger once without dm-crypt, dm-crypt is off the hook.  Just
> to verify, when you say without luks, you mean without any crypto bits
> in use at all on the filesystems postgres uses?
> 
> Usually the trick to reproducing filesystem corruptions is adding memory
> pressure.  The corruption is probably a bad interaction between reads
> and writes, and we need to make sure the reads actually happen.
> 
> http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/pin_ram.c
> 
> gcc -Wall -o pin_ram pin_ram.c
> 
> pin_ram -m 80%-of-your-ram-in-mb

Implemented in xfstests about 10 years ago:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git;a=blob;f=src/usemem.c;h=b8794a6b209cebf8dbf312a8ef131e2e54b18d29;hb=HEAD

:P

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/