Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoidlock semantics

[Tejun Heo]

Hey, again.

On 12/15/2010 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'd prefer percpu things going through percpu tree, if for nothing
> else for git history's sake, but I don't think it really matters.  The
> series is spread all over the place anyway.  As long as each
> maintainer is properly alerted about the changes, it should be okay.
> Please let me know whether you agree with the changes currently queued
> in percpu#for-next.  I'll update the tree with your Acked-by's and
> freeze it.

Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next?  If so,
I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously
mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/