Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework

[Tony Lindgren]

* Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> [101216 13:34]:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > I've seen a lot of discussion about this, are all of the review comments
> >> > now addressed?
> >>
> >> Yes, all comments were addressed in this v3 iteration, and this thread
> >> has been idle for about 10 days.
> >
> > That's because we are all busy with other things :(
> 
> Oh sure, my intention was only positive (to demonstrate that there are
> no outstanding comments), sorry if it sounded differently than
> intended.
> 
> > Sorry, I really don't have the time at the moment to review this code,
> > nor does it seem to affect areas that I maintain, so I don't understand
> > what you are looking for from me.
> 
> Sorry for the noise - I contacted you because you maintain the driver
> core, in the hope you could suggest where this can go through.
> 
> Tony, Andrew, can you please have a look ?
> 
> Any comment or suggestion is appreciated.

Looks sane to me from omap point of view and it seems the locks
are now all timeout based:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/